Resposta a “O wokismo é uma crença, não é uma ideologia política” de Guilherme Valente

▪ Introdução ▪ Primeiro e principal erro ▪ O que é Calvinismo? ▪ O que Guilherme defende a maior parte das vezes ▪ Análise da sua alegação ▪ O seu argumentário ▪ Ligação entre cristianismo e comunismo ▪ Calvinismo e Wokismo ▪ O Reino de Deus segundo Calvino ▪ Papel do governo civil segundo Calvino …

Response to Michael Huemer’s “Is God Impossible?”

In this blog article Huemer makes a case for the strong claim that it is impossible for God to exist. Stated in another way, God is incompatible with all considerations we can come up with about the world. However the god he deals with in the article is not the God presented in special revelation, …

As Crianças são Propriedade dos Pais, Agosto de 2021, João P. Miranda

Conteúdos: Motivações deste artigo ▪ Ponto de partida ▪ As opiniões em contenda ▪ A minha opinião: a propriedade ▪ A minha opinião: Artur e o governo português *   *   * Motivações deste artigo Maioritariamente, o conflito de interesses entre Artur Mesquita Guimarães e o atual governo português, relativamente a qual é a educação que …

Response to Michael Huemer’s “What’s the Best Afterlife?” (part 2)

Continuing… ii) Eternal heaven seems to be inconsistent with other parts of Christianity To show this supposed inconsistency Huemer imagined a dialogue between a Christian theist and an atheist. However, this Christian theist seems to be one of those pop pelagian autosoterist types. Let’s take a look at this dialogue and see how a Commonsense-Calvinist …

Response to Michael Huemer’s “What’s the Best Afterlife?” (part 1)

In this blog article Huemer challenges the visible Church in two fronts: i) he notes how difficult it is to conceive how eternal heaven can be good for those that live there; ii) he challenges the consistency of the realities the redeemed believe in. In this response I will address only point i). i) Eternal …

A response to Daniel Akande’s “Does Logic Presuppose Christianity? — Part 4: The Epistemology of Logic”

Hitherto I didn’t say a thing about why I’m responding to every blog article Daniel writes. The answer is, I’m a writing my master’s thesis, and in it there will be some discussion about presuppositionalism. My hope with this series was to find something stronger to fight with. I’ve read Oliphint, Marsden, van Til, Bahnsen; …

A response to Daniel Akande’s “Does Logic Presuppose Christianity? — Part 3: The Ontology of Logic”

Once more I will respond to Daniel. The method will be the same: quote and response. Click here for the full article. In this blog article Daniel unpacks one class of arguments for the presupposition of Christianity concerning logic. Those arguments can be classified as abductive. The arguments are designed to show that Christianity has …

Fanaticism

There was a common term used in the 18th and 19th century called “enthusiasm”. This term points more or less into the same things “fanaticism” does. We can find fanatics in all walks of life. They can be rich or poor, vulgar or sophisticated, it doesn’t matter the culture of his cradle or the race …

A response to Daniel V.A.’s “Does Logic Presuppose Christianity? — Part 2: What Is Logic?”

Once more I will respond to Daniel. The method will be the same: quote and response. Click here for the full article. This is a weird way to define LOGIC (in formal semantics we usually use italicised capital letters or simply capital letters to refer to concepts). It’s like defining PHYSICS as a set of …

A response to Daniel V.A.’s “The Authority of Scripture”

In this blog article (here) Daniel responds to another blog article here. He makes a fair exposition of his adversary, but his responses are perfect examples of presuppositionalist's wishful thinking. I’m going to jump directly into these responses, and so, for context purposes, one must have the original article at hand. Both Daniel and his …

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Iniciar